In a sweeping move to reshape how minors interact with digital platforms, the state of Texas has enacted a new law requiring Apple and Google to verify the ages of users on their app stores. Set to take effect on January 1, 2026, the law mandates that app store operators ensure users under 18 have parental consent before they can download any app — including games, messaging platforms, and social media apps.
The legislation is part of a broader push by Texas lawmakers to shield children and teenagers from what they argue is an increasingly harmful and addictive digital environment. Supporters say the law is designed to put tech companies on the hook for protecting young users, while critics warn that it opens the door to significant privacy, enforcement, and constitutional issues.
Under the new requirements, companies will be responsible for implementing robust age verification systems. These systems must be able to distinguish minors from adults, and where a user is under 18, obtain verifiable parental consent before allowing access to certain content or applications. Previously, many apps and platforms relied on self-reported age information, often with few or no follow-up checks. The Texas law seeks to close that loophole by placing responsibility on the app store level — a move that significantly broadens the scope of regulation.
While the law applies to all apps downloaded through app stores, it is clearly aimed at curbing youth access to social media platforms, where concerns about mental health, online predators, and data privacy have become increasingly urgent. Multiple studies have pointed to negative mental health outcomes associated with excessive social media use, particularly among teenage girls.
The legislation has drawn mixed reactions from major tech firms. While some companies acknowledge the importance of protecting young users, there are deep concerns about how such regulations will be implemented in practice. Apple, in particular, reportedly raised alarms over the privacy implications of collecting and storing sensitive age-related data. Google, too, has expressed caution, warning that broad mandates could create significant logistical and security challenges.
Despite the pushback, Texas lawmakers remain firm in their position. State leaders argue that the burden should fall on multi-billion dollar companies to safeguard children, not on parents who often struggle to monitor digital activity across multiple platforms and devices.
In parallel with the age verification measure, Texas lawmakers have also proposed a more controversial bill: an outright ban on social media access for anyone under 18. The proposed legislation passed the Texas House earlier this year and aimed to prohibit platforms such as TikTok, Instagram, and Snapchat from providing services to minors. However, that effort has stalled in the state Senate, with little time left in the current legislative session.
Opponents of the social media ban argue that it raises serious First Amendment concerns. Civil liberties groups warn that banning entire age groups from digital communication platforms could set a dangerous precedent, even if well-intentioned. They also question the effectiveness of such bans, noting that tech-savvy teens are often able to bypass restrictions using VPNs or fake credentials.
Despite the hurdles, Texas’s efforts are being closely watched by other states. Utah, Arkansas, and Louisiana have already passed laws requiring parental consent for minors’ access to social media or adult content online. With Texas joining the movement — and going further by targeting the app stores themselves — a new national standard may be emerging.
As the digital landscape continues to evolve, the question remains: How far should government go in protecting minors online? Texas’s latest legislation offers a clear, if controversial, answer — and signals that more dramatic moves could be on the horizon.