In an unusual move to retain talent and avoid losing top employees to competitors, Google has reportedly been paying certain artificial intelligence (AI) staff to do nothing for a full year instead of allowing them to join rival companies. The controversial strategy is said to be aimed at protecting Google’s position in the highly competitive and rapidly growing AI industry.
Sources familiar with the situation revealed that Google has provided these employees with full salaries and benefits but instructed them to refrain from working on any significant projects or taking on new responsibilities. The company’s objective, according to insiders, is to deter them from leaving for rival firms that are intensifying their efforts in AI research and development.
The policy reportedly targets high-value employees, particularly those with specialized AI expertise, who could potentially be poached by major competitors like OpenAI, Microsoft, and Meta. These companies are aggressively expanding their AI teams as the demand for innovative technologies, such as generative AI, continues to skyrocket.

While this move may seem counterintuitive to many in the corporate world, it underscores the intense battle for AI talent in Silicon Valley and beyond. Google, long recognized as one of the pioneers in the AI field, has faced increasing competition in recent years from other tech giants that have been making significant strides in AI advancements.
In response to queries, a Google spokesperson declined to comment directly on the specifics of the strategy but confirmed the company’s continued commitment to nurturing its talent. “We are focused on supporting and retaining the world’s top AI experts, ensuring they have opportunities to grow with Google while contributing to our mission of advancing AI responsibly,” the spokesperson said.
The strategy has raised eyebrows, with some industry analysts questioning the ethics and long-term effectiveness of paying employees to remain idle. Some argue that it could lead to frustration and disengagement among staff, potentially harming Google’s reputation as a progressive employer. On the other hand, others see it as a pragmatic solution to a critical problem—protecting intellectual property and securing the company’s future in a competitive market.
In any case, Google’s controversial approach highlights the fierce competition in AI, an industry where talent is not only highly coveted but also essential to maintaining a competitive edge. As the AI race accelerates, it remains to be seen whether this tactic will pay off in the long run or whether it will prompt other companies to adopt similar practices.
![]()
As of now, many of the affected employees have reportedly accepted the arrangement, though it’s unclear how they feel about being sidelined for an entire year. Some are said to be using the downtime to focus on personal projects or to upskill in different areas, while others remain uncertain about the long-term implications of this unique employment strategy.
The story of Google’s AI talent retention plan is just another chapter in the unfolding drama of the AI arms race—one that continues to shape the future of technology and how companies approach their most valuable assets: their people.









